December 11, 2020
For any questions or indications, you can contact the company at the email@example.com. In this case, it was a shareholders` pact between the three founding shareholders of a Swiss limited company (regulated by Sco 620 and SCO). The agreement was concluded without limitation over time and declared non-resilient.15 The agreement provided for several shareholder obligations (including a right of each shareholder to be elected to the board of directors and a right of pre-emption). It also provided for a penalty clause of CHF 40,000 for each breach of contract. The Bundesgerichtshof had to decide whether the distributor had sufficiently demonstrated the damages it had claimed upon the termination of the contract. The cantonal court found that the evidence presented by the distributor during the proceedings was not sufficient to prove its prejudice, since it only partially provided product-specific financial data and that its calculations were based on average financial data at the company level as a whole. In addition, the trader did not argue in a timely manner during the proceedings that the products in question (which are covered by the agreement) were representative of all the products he marketed, so that the company`s financial figures could also apply to the products at issue. If we refer to “you” and “you,” we are talking about the company`s customer, who is an authorized user of the trading platform, or a visitor to our website www.swissmarketindex.com who is not a customer of the company. If you choose to download our software to take advantage of the commercial event, the terms and conditions of this document apply to you (if any) and by downloading the software, you accept the same thing and agree to comply with the applicable conditions, even if you are not treated as our customer and we have no obligation to you. At the expiry or expiry of the contract, the brand may continue its commercial relationship with potential customers that the importer imports, without any remuneration or compensation from the importer. In the last two months of 1999, the parties negotiated marketing plans, sales targets and price structures, and no agreement was reached for lollipops until the end of 1999. In a letter dated March 2, 2000, the supplier informed its exclusive distributor that it would be replaced and that the distribution of the products would be transferred to only one other company as of May 2, 2000.
The result was the opening of an action by the exclusive distributor in the Zurich District Court, in which he sought damages from the supplier for breach (s. 97 and following SCO) and compensation for the overvalue (Article 418u SCO). It was found that the supplier found that the contract had been breached for improper termination of the contract.41 Location: – The parties expressly state that the agreement expresses their agreement with respect to its purpose and invalidates and replaces all previous agreements between them with respect to their property.
© 2021 Zoe Tennesen . Creative Director | Theme by Eleven Themes